
![]()
Near the opening of The Hangover, four men gather on the rooftop of Caesar’s Palace, Sin City glittering like so much neon forbidden fruit below them. They are in Las Vegas to celebrate Doug’s (Justin Bartha) impending nuptials, or more accurately, see to it that his last night as a bachelor is as debauched as humanly possible. Flanked by his best friends Phil (Bradley Cooper) and Stu (Ed Helms), and his future brother-in-law Alan (Zach Galifianakis), Doug smiles naively while Phil lifts a shot glass heavenward and intones, “To a night we’ll never forget.” So much for that idea.
When the three groomsmen wake up to pounding headaches the next morning, their hotel room looks like a war zone, though they can’t remember how it got that way. In fact, they have no memory of the previous night at all. The story gets crazier as their memory gets hazier. There’s a tiger in the bathroom and a baby in the closet. Stu is missing a tooth. Phil is wearing a hospital bracelet. Mike Tyson is in the living room singing Phil Collins. When they ask for their car, the valet brings them a stolen police cruiser with a naked man in the trunk. And to make matters worse, Doug is nowhere to be found. Desperate to decode their collective amnesia, the trio must piece together the clues and retrace their steps to figure out where things went wrong if they are to have any hope of finding Doug and getting him to his wedding on time.
While Judd Apatow had nothing to do with The Hangover, (it was smartly directed by Todd Phillips of Old School fame) it is nonetheless his progeny. There is a real story here, and a clever one at that, despite being one of the crassest, envelope-pushing films in recent memory. The Hangover unwinds like a mystery novel; we are as lost as the characters are, so the ride is equally raucous and unexpected.
Populated with the now archetypical man-children (although Galifianakis is the most obvious example — a giant, bearded infant who wears a sport cup like it is a diaper and is even referred to as a child — all the men are in desperate need of growing up), the film is guided by a lucid plot rather than a series of non-connected misadventures, convincingly carrying its dumb heroes from hedonism to self-discovery. Together, the men form a badly-behaved Wizard of Oz triad — men in search of heart, courage and brains. (Does that make the tiger Toto?)
The Hangover does a splendid job of juxtaposing its wildly different lead characters. Cooper (who can play both the good guy and the jerk with equal conviction) appears to be the new “it” guy — it took you long enough, Hollywood. Helms, best known from his time on The Daily Show and The Office, is the meek, submissive one, dominated by his vicious, overbearing girlfriend. And Galifianakis, a muted comedian just starting to enter the national consciousness, steals the show despite a weird bit in which child molestation is used as fodder for a cheap laugh. (Ken Jeong and Daily Show alum Rob Riggle have cameos that, while funny, are played far too broadly to fit organically within the rest of the film.)
Vulgar, obscene and offensive, The Hangover is one of the funniest movies I’ve seen in a very long time and is surely destined to become a comedy classic.
© Copyright 2009 Brandon Fibbs. All rights reserved.






7 responses so far ↓
1 Grinth // Jun 8, 2009 at 8:17 pm
Just curious, exactly what qualifies as child molestation? Having seen the film (and loved it. It’s about time Zach gets a bit of the recognition he deserves) nothing in it qualifies as child molestation in my book.
2 pregnancy // Jun 9, 2009 at 12:38 am
it is great!!! like the baby
3 Brandon Fibbs // Jun 9, 2009 at 6:56 am
There was a whole bit at the school in the beginning in which Alan admits he is not allowed, by law, to be close to children or anywhere children may play. It is strongly suggested he has an inappropriate history with kids. Throughout the film there are moments where he interacts oddly with kids, including in the car on the way to Vegas, etc. Then there is the baby masturbation scene, etc…
4 Grinth // Jun 9, 2009 at 11:24 am
I personally don’t consider the baby masturbation scene as child molestation.
As far as having a restraining order against going close to schools and Chuck E. Cheese. That’s been stated, by people, including Zach himself, that the whole idea is his character so desperately wants to be friends and hang out with people, he does, whether or not its appropriate for him to be hanging out with them.
5 Brandon Fibbs // Jun 9, 2009 at 8:52 pm
That may be, but if you have to explain it in interviews like that, it isn’t even remotely obvious. In fact, I think we both know the direction the film presents is quite opposite.
6 Grinth // Jun 10, 2009 at 6:13 pm
You know how I hate to disagree with you =), but I’m gonna!
Of course the immediate question that pops into mind when Alan openly admits he’s not allowed within 200 feet of schools or Chuck E. Cheese (which, by the way, is a reference to his stand up “When you look like I do its difficult to get a table for one at Chuck E. Cheese” …yeah I’m a long time fan) is why that is the case, but I think it becomes obvious through the film that it has nothing to do with child molestation. I would go down a list of moments in the film for why I feel that way, but I don’t want to have accidental spoilers and I gather from your last post it is probably best that I don’t.
For what its worth though, an informal survey of people I know who’ve seen the film (all various industry types so take it for what its worth! =) ) not one felt child molestation comes into play in the film.
7 fensonism // Jul 29, 2009 at 9:59 pm
Though a rip-off of Dude, Where’s My Car, this film did it’s job in perfecting the story.
Leave a Comment