<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angels &amp; Demons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://BrandonFibbs.com/2009/05/14/angels-demons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://BrandonFibbs.com/2009/05/14/angels-demons/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:05:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://BrandonFibbs.com/2009/05/14/angels-demons/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://BrandonFibbs.com/?p=1021#comment-648</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you actually read the book Mr. Fibbs.  Otherwise, you would know that the movie is very loosely based from the book.  It is no &quot;film adaptation&quot; by any means, it&#039;s simply it&#039;s own movie that borrowed ideas from the source material.  With that said, the movie is &quot;okay&quot; on it&#039;s own, but is complete trash compared to the novel.  Expectantly disappointing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you actually read the book Mr. Fibbs.  Otherwise, you would know that the movie is very loosely based from the book.  It is no &#8220;film adaptation&#8221; by any means, it&#8217;s simply it&#8217;s own movie that borrowed ideas from the source material.  With that said, the movie is &#8220;okay&#8221; on it&#8217;s own, but is complete trash compared to the novel.  Expectantly disappointing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://BrandonFibbs.com/2009/05/14/angels-demons/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://BrandonFibbs.com/?p=1021#comment-616</guid>
		<description>I would have to say your nuts. this movie was NOTHING like the book. Half of it was gone, and the ending left out the biggest part of the science vs. religion! A priest who is a product of science, destroying science..thats the whole story, and the left it out? Come on, if you didn&#039;t read the book, you&#039;ll  like it, if you read the book, you&#039;ll be VERY disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to say your nuts. this movie was NOTHING like the book. Half of it was gone, and the ending left out the biggest part of the science vs. religion! A priest who is a product of science, destroying science..thats the whole story, and the left it out? Come on, if you didn&#8217;t read the book, you&#8217;ll  like it, if you read the book, you&#8217;ll be VERY disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

