
1/2
This review first appeared in The Colorado Springs Gazette. To read this review at its original source, click here.
Knowing is the sort of movie M. Night Shyamalan wishes he was still making. Marketed as a supernatural sci-fi thriller, Knowing is something else entirely, a gorgeous, spooky, stylized doomsday enigma that utterly eclipses its largely hokey brethren. Entrancing even when it is at its most outlandish, Knowing is a breathtaking metaphysical rumination that, in the final seconds, actually caused me to cry out loud in uninhibited glee.
In 1958, Miss Taylor’s fifth grade class was asked to draw pictures of how they envisioned the future would appear as part of a dedication ceremony for their new elementary school. But one strange little girl decided instead to fill her paper with row upon row of apparently random numbers. Fifty years later, a time capsule containing their artwork is unearthed and the girl’s cryptic message finds its way into the hands of a young boy named Caleb (Chandler Canterbury). When Caleb brings the piece of paper home, his father John (Nicolas Cage), an MIT astrophysics professor rapidly drinking himself into oblivion after the recent death of his wife, discovers that the numbers aren’t random at all, but are, in fact, an encoded message predicting with pinpoint accuracy the dates, death tolls and coordinates of every major disaster of the past 50 years…and some that have yet to occur.
As John begins to grasp that the 50-year-old piece of paper portends the apocalyptic end of the world, mysterious strangers begin haunting the woods around his house, confirming the fact that he and his son are somehow involved. Aided by the daughter and granddaughter (Rose Byrne and Lara Robinson) of the now-deceased prophetess, John attempts to use his knowledge to prevent the global catastrophe from taking place. But how can mere mortals stand in the way of predestination?
Nicolas Cage is not an actor. He is a personality black hole, an empty void in the shape of a human body. I went confidently into Knowing solely because of my faith in director Alex Proyas, who, in 1998, made one of my favorite films, the ground-breaking sci-fi Dark City, which pioneered some of the ideas The Matrix later took credit for. Here those ideas find expression in the tug of war between fate and determinism, the belief that our lives and our universe are ruled either by order or by randomness and coincidence. Is there meaning to our existence, or, as Cage’s character suggests, does a certain bodily function “just happen”?
Proyas’ Knowing is simultaneously unnerving and mystifying. It is a work of arresting craftsmanship and nightmarish imagery, complete with scenes of disquieting tragedy. Dark and menacing, Knowing has one foot in horror and the other in science fiction, straddling a gulf running over with metaphysical language. How you walk away from Knowing depends largely on what you believe. Luckily, you don’t have to believe what the film believes or endorse the mythology it appropriates to be blown away by the audaciousness of its vision.
If I have been vague in my assessment of the film thus far, it is intentional. I could and want to say so much more, but to do so would surely ruin the film’s considerable impact.
© Copyright 2009 Brandon Fibbs. All rights reserved.






3 responses so far ↓
1 Mark // Mar 20, 2009 at 9:29 am
Very interesting review. It makes me want to see this movie now, despite my agreement with your well put assessment about Nicolas Cage. It’s too bad a movie as interesting as this couldn’t have a different actor assigned.
2 Dan Benamor // Mar 21, 2009 at 11:17 pm
Brandon, we tend to have the same opinions on a lot of stuff and this is totally exhibit A. I saw “Knowing” tonight expecting it to be one of the worst movies of the year, which a number of critics said. After seeing it I can’t fathom why people have been THIS harsh on it, and personally found it very interesting and applauded its ambition.
3 Dan P // Apr 8, 2009 at 3:02 pm
Hahaha… I love that comment about Cage as an actor- one of the best insults ever. Brilliant.
I went to see it after your review in the Gazette (by the way, it had a perfect ‘A’ there and here you gave it 3.5 stars?)– I was pretty much vastly disappointed. The visuals were AWESOME, but every character was nothing more than a cliche. The spooky supernatural kid, the alcoholic depressed widower single father who meets up with the sweet widowed single mother, the wise but wrong concerned best friend… etc.
Interesting how you and Roger Ebert both cite Dark City as one of your faves, and then based on metacritic you’re the only two I know of who have given Knowing such a rave review.
Great to have you at the Gazette though, cheers.
Leave a Comment